|
Designers are Advocates
Interior designers across the United States continue to
be the leading voices for their profession by spearheading
regulatory legislation.
By Karina Sanchez
 |
 |
Photography by Eddy Marissen/Foto Natura/Getty Images |
Interior designers for decades
now have fought to join
the ranks of architects and
engineers - those professionals
who are legally
recognized and licensed to
ensure their qualifications
and education. But thanks
to many trailblazing interior
designers advocating for
the profession as a whole,
interior design legislation
is becoming a reality, state
by state and province by
province.
Today, 26 U.S. states have
enacted either a title act or
a practice act - Colorado
has a permitting statute in
place - and more are in the
process of introducing and
passing legislation. In
Canada, one province has a
practice act and six others
have title acts.
Put simply, title acts govern
the use of a title, such
as registered or certified
interior designer, but do
not require individuals to
become licensed to practice
Interior Design.
Practice acts, although
they govern the use of a
title, also require practicing
interior designers to
become licensed.
It’s easy to see why such
regulation is necessary both for public safety and
the enrichment of the interior
design profession.
Under the framework of the
U.S. Constitution's 10th
Amendment, states regulate
professions that involve
public health, safety and
welfare. Interior designers
are responsible for such
tasks as specifying flameretardant
fabrics, designing
living spaces for the elderly
or disabled, facilitating safe
ingress and egress, and
choosing non-toxic sustainable
products - all of
which are vital to public
health, safety and welfare.
Recently, Perspective
spoke with three inspirational
interior designers
who, recognizing this
tremendous need, have
helped pave the way for
legislation in their respective
states.
Back in the
1980s, Cary
Johnson,
FIIDA, LEED
AP, was asked for a
simple favor by colleague
Spes Mekus, IIDA, now of
Tanager Design Group.
Mekus, active in the Illinois
Interior Design Coalition,
requested that Johnson
join her and offer a little
assistance getting legislation
passed in the state.
Now, more than 20
years later, that favor is
still being carried out.
Illinois passed its interior
design title act in 1990,
but the coalition - still
with Johnson's support -
continues to fight to protect
that legislation.
True, it took some positive
peer pressure to first
get Johnson involved, but
he soon realized on his
own the necessity of interior
design legislation. "It's
important for the public to
have a way of discerning
whether the [design] professionals
they are considering
are qualified to do
the job," he says. The realization
that poor service
places lives at risk was the
driving factor in his decision
to fight for regulation.
Johnson found one of
his most prized supporters
to be Timothy Hennessey,
the coalition's original
lobbyist. It was Hennessey's experience in association
management, public relations
strategies, executive
and financial management,
and strategic planning
that helped map out
a strategy for dealing with
legislators. Hennessey
introduced Johnson to
appropriate supporters
and helped handle the
opposition. "Lobbyists
know what legislators are
all about, and can identify
committee members that
are critical to convince
and which legislators
should be your sponsors
on the legislative floor,"
he says.
One of Johnson's priorities
was communicating
with those who opposed
legislation: end-users, the
general public and other
design professionals,
many of whom did not
understand what Interior
Design involves, nor how
regulation improves
accountability. He scheduled
one-on-one meetings
to help educate the opposition
and conducted public
forums where issues
were brought to the table
and noted for later legislative
meetings. The information
gathered was then
used to tweak the bill's
wording to address the
opposition's issues.
Johnson was also
charged with defining which specific professions
would fall under the act.
"Crafting legislation wording
so that other design
professionals weren't compromised
was an important
part in dealing with the
opposition," he says. To
avoid disenfranchising certain individuals, the
proposed legislation incorporated
the words "or
equal" when referring to a
specific qualification, such
as the National Council
for Interior Design
Qualification (NCIDQ).
That way, professionals with different exam credentials
would be responsible
for proving to the
state's regulatory board
that their qualification is
equal to the NCIDQ.
His experience crafting
the title act eventually led
to his involvement in creating
the International
Building Code. Enacted in
1997, the International
Building Code was a
consolidation of three different
codes, with varying
requirements, used
throughout the United
States. Because previously
there wasn't a universal
code, it was difficult for
design professionals to
practice in more than one
location. The International
Building Code collected
all the codes into one for a
municipality to adopt.
Johnson helped define
the many terms used in
the new code, one being
"design professional."
Initially, only architects and
engineers were included in
the definition. "It took a lot
to testify that 'interior
designer' would not be
excluded [as a design professional],"
he says.
Johnson's involvement
in legislation has been
far-reaching, but he hasn't
had enough yet. "It never
stops," he says, adding that
with the profession as
dynamic as it is, there will
be changes affecting legislation
now and in the
future. "I'll be involved and
supportive, but I'm not
leading a coalition these
days," he says. "I'm leaving
room for our young design
professionals to step in."
Derrell Parker,
FIIDA, has a
mantra: Stop blaming
others for what you don't
have. "Just go out and do
it," he says, referring to
interior design legislation
and the mindset
needed to take those
first steps.
As a young interior
designer in the early 1980s
working at architecture
firm Ferris, Alexander,
Congdon, Massinari
(FACM) in Las
Vegas, Parker
watched architects
with his similar
level of experience
and education
being promoted as partners.
As an interior designer, he
could not be recognized as
a partner, even with a
degree in Interior Design
from an accredited university.
Thus, he was inspired
to get up and do something
about it.
Parker realized early on
that politics are local, and
to affect change, you have
to be involved on a grassroots
level. So he started at
the bottom, asking coalition
members seated in
the meeting room if they
were registered voters. "I
was often the only one
standing," he says. Priority
No. 1: Register people in
the coalition to vote.
From there, Parker
knew he needed to motivate
the coalition; that
meant helping members
understand why they were there. It was through
constant meetings with
coalition members,
architects, legislators and
end-users that he was
able to inspire people
through his passion.
"Nevada now has a joint
board with interior
designers and architects,
and there have been no
major fallouts," he says.
"We've proven we are
here for the long haul. If
you show you're serious,
it'll pay off in the end."
Nine years after conceptualizing
a plan for
interior design legislation in Nevada, its practice
act was enacted. The
majority of those nine
years were dedicated to
education, submitting
articles to local newspapers
and magazines,
attending council meetings,
holding town hall
meetings, speaking at
high schools and colleges.
Because, as Parker
found, the correlation
between Interior Design
and public safety is not
always immediately
understood by lay people.
"[The practice act
shows] that the state of
Nevada has done everything
it can to ensure
that those working in and
using the built environment
are qualified by
virtue of education,
experience and examination
to provide the
safest possible environment,"
Parker says.
"And because of legislation,
we're finding more
savvy young people
coming into design
than ever before."
Parker says colleges
and universities are
doing a better job educating
interior design
students about the many
aspects of design, from
safety codes to ethics.
"[Today's young designers]
are well aware that
they need an accredited
degree. They come to
work, and they create
their own timelines to get
the NCIDQ [exam],"
he says.
Parker still travels regularly
from state to state
to give presentations to
coalitions on what to
expect when passing legislation,
how the Nevada
coalition did it and what
it's doing now.
Even as an
undergrad at
Louisiana State
University during
the 1970s, Deborah
Steinmetz, FIIDA, recognized
the importance of
conveying to the public
that Interior Design
stretches far beyond
furniture placement and
choosing colors. "In college,
I understood that
it was more than decorating.
I knew what I
could do as an interior
designer and how
[Interior Design] influenced
the well-being of
others," she says. So,
early in her career, she
decided to get involved
with the newly developed
Licensed Interior
Designers of Louisiana
Coalition.
During the 1980s, the
coalition introduced its
bill, testifying the need
for it in front of state and
local legislators. Like
Steinmetz a few years
prior, the state's interior
design students were a
major part of the grassroots
efforts, helping
educate the public about
Interior Design.
Steinmetz's chosen
plan of attack? Education
through face-to-face
contact. "It's amazing
how myths about the profession start disappearing
once you talk to
people one-on-one," she
says. Steinmetz and the
coalition continued to
educate architects, code
officials, fire marshals,
legislators, end-users,
the public and even
those within the interior
design profession. This
was done by conducting
town hall meetings, visiting
the state capital, and
meeting with as many
legislators and lobbyists
for architects, engineers
and home builders
as possible.
Steinmetz quickly discovered
that you can't
win every battle. She
recalls a one-on-one
meeting with an interior
designer who did not
support the legislation
because he was opposed
to government regulation
of any form. The two sat
together and weighed the
pros and cons. Still, the
designer refused to lend
support. "Some days you
cut your losses and move
on," Steinmetz says. Over
the years, she's been met
with other opposing
views. "That's where you
learn to make compromises,"
she says. "But
don't destroy the core of
what you want accomplished.
Be ready to compromise, but know
where to hold the line."
Moving forward,
Steinmetz is confident
that the upcoming generation
of designers is just
as passionate and dedicated
to increasing the
professionalism of
Interior Design through
legislation. With a seat
on Louisiana's state
board, she sees firsthand
how students are
becoming more
involved, sitting in on
legislative meetings.
Steinmetz's focus is
now on this newest generation
of designers.
With her involvement in
NCIDQ's Interior Design
Experience Program -
created to help entry-level
designers and students
prepare for the NCIDQ
exam and gain workplace
experience through
mentorships - she helps
young designers experience
both the professional
and legislative sides of
the business. Other
interior designers should
be motivated to do the
same, she says. "Talk to
classes, give presentations
and make yourself available
for professional college
courses," she says.
"There are a lot of ways
to get involved with
young designers."
back
to top
|