| The Power to be Valued |
|
 |
Designers can use their knowledge and talents to service the most basic needs of human beings across the globe.
With Cameron Sinclair
"We challenge the design profession to respond to the 98 percent of the world that does not benefit from our services and to foster public appreciation for the many ways that architecture and design can improve lives."
—Cameron Sinclair
Profit and productivity will forever be goals in design. But it’s the opportunity to help people at the most primal levels that elevates design to its highest power. Here, Perspective talks with a leader in this important humanitarian movement, Cameron Sinclair, about the path to human dignity through shelter. Sinclair, co-founder and Executive Director of Architecture for Humanity, which encourages architecture and design solutions to aid people in humanitarian crises, knows firsthand the power design to make all human beings, regardless of status, feel valued.
How do interior designers affect people’s sense of value and importance?
Being a designer is about trying to improve the well-being of people by providing hope and a sense of place. But that mission can compete with profitability. Most interior designers I know try to find a balance in their work. They work for clients who can help them pay the bills, and then they also try to do some pro bono projects.
That’s our focus at Architecture for Humanity — to get interior designers, architects and engineers involved in humanitarian work in a way that best utilizes their expertise. We challenge the design profession to respond to the 98 percent of the world that does not benefit from our services and to foster public appreciation for the many ways that architecture and design can improve lives.
Do you feel the general public has a grasp of design’s potential to improve people’s lives?
Not in the United States. And that’s a byproduct of the way design is represented in the media. To the general public, interior design is HGTV and “Extreme Home Makeover.” Then there are the design magazines. When you open a typical design magazine, you see projects by big-name designers for high-profile clients. It leads to a perception that interior designers work only for very wealthy clients doing very exclusive projects. In reality, that represents a small sector of the work being done. So much is being done in the areas of social services, schools, civic buildings and public spaces. Those are much more challenging and do not get the recognition they deserve.
There are exceptions to this rule. Dwell and ReadyMade are two magazines doing a fantastic job of showing a more holistic approach to design. And outside of the United States, design is a conversation that happens on a national level. Denmark created the INDEX Awards, a state-funded program that recognizes design that has improved people’s lives.
Your new book, Design Like You Give a Damn, is another example of an exception to that rule, correct?
True. The book was born out of conversations that kept occurring at events where both Kate Stohr and I would talk about projects and designers that we felt were doing a lot of good in the world, and no one had ever heard of them! These are great projects.
A perfect example is the Rufisque Women’s Center in rural Senegal. It is a cooperative center used by more than 50 women’s groups and designed by a young Finnish firm called Hollmen-Reuter-Sandman Architects. It’s a very striking building, and it shows that when you bring an innovative, pragmatic and
beautiful building into a community with a design team attached to it, it can become a catalyst for change
in the community.
By publishing these projects, we’re giving them the same high-profile coverage that the glossy magazines are giving the non-humanitarian projects. We’re showing that there are designers who care as much about ethics as they do about aesthetics.
In addition to design professionals, another ideal purchaser of this book would be a parent buying books for a child who is going off to college to study architecture or interior design. I am hoping that the next generation of design students will come with an inherent awareness of this way of working.
How does Architecture for Humanity measure the success of its humanitarian projects?
We’re doing a lot of post-Tsunami rebuilding in India. We’re focusing on not just building a series of individual homes, but on rebuilding the entire community — things like schools and medical clinics. We’re essentially creating the life of the town, which is both holistic and sustainable.
How do you measure the success of a humanitarian design project?
There are the usual assessments, such as whether the space is working as it was intended to function and whether the community likes it, but it’s important to go beyond that. The biggest criteria for success is whether the community has taken ownership of it. We work hard during our projects to involve the community in the process. That way, when we leave, there is a natural transferring of ownership and perhaps even a call to continue the work.
We did a small school in Sri Lanka after the Tsunami, for example. When we left, the community was inspired to do one of its own. It’s truly sustainable renewal.
back
to top |